Sunday, January 20, 2013

Blog #6




 Copy and complete the activity at the end of chapter two of:

  • Freeman, D., and Y. Freeman. Essential linguistics: What you need to know to teach: reading, ESL, spelling, phonics, grammar. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Determine Learning (L) vs. Acquisition (A) and explain your answers on your blog.


 As I was reading, Written and Second Language Acquisition, I had many thoughts and feelings about the two styles of learning.  When teaching reading, I see both components (learning and acquisition) being done in the classroom daily.  In the primary grades, teachers really focus on the phonics and word recognition part of reading.  Students have to learn how to decode a word or recognize it as a sight word, in order to increase fluency and overall acquire comprehension.  They also, however, read big books with illustrations or have students read familiar songs and engage them in poetry in order for students to acquire their own meaning  to make connections between oral reading and the print.  With this in mind, I think students need both learning and acquisition to become successful learners.  Sociopsycholinguistic learning for reading is a bit higher level, because students are learning how to read and comprehend by making meaning from the text and using background knowledge.  Word recognition is taught by the teacher in a set curriculum or daily routine and allows students to learn strategies.  When dealing with these two views,  I feel  Sociopsycholinguistic learning  can only happen for those students who have solid background knowledge and a good vocabulary bank from their home life.  I feel sociopsycholinguistic makes learning for Sped students and some ELL students hard.  They need more of a word recognition and direct instruction to help them learn decoding , vocabulary, and phonics.   

When teaching, I feel I do a pretty good job at balancing the two views.  As I was looking at this list, I can see that some of these activities can fall under both views as well.  However, some of the activities students are learning though direct teacher guidance.  Other activities are focused on helping the student understand what they read or hear. 

The students:
L              look up words in the dictionary to write definitions
A             make a Venn diagram to compare two stories
L              practice sounding out words
L/A         read in round robin fashion
L              correct peers when they make a mistake
L/A         identify words on a big book page that start with the same sound
L/A         group cards with classmates’ names by a criterion on such as first or last letter
A             write rhyming poetry and then discuss different spellings for the same sound
L              ask teacher how to spell any word they don’t know
A             read a language experience story they have created with the teacher
A             work in pairs to arrange words from a familiar chant into sentences
L              divides words into syllables
L              on a worksheet, draw a line from each word to the picture that starts with the same sound
A             make alphabet books on different topics

The teacher:
L              preteaches vocabulary
A             does a shared reading with a big book
L              make sure that students read only books that fit their level
L              has students’ segment words into phonemes
A             write words the students dictate for a story and has students help with the spelling of difficult words
A             asks students to look around the room and find words starting with a certain letter
L              uses decodable text
A             set aside time for SSR (sustained silent reading) each day
L              teaches Latin and Greek roots
A             has students meet in literature circles
L              conducts phonics drills
L/A         chooses predictable texts
A             teaches students different comprehension strategies
A             does a picture walk of a new book
L              uses a variety of worksheets to teach different skills

3 Comments:

At January 24, 2013 at 8:15 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

Amberlyn - I find it interesting that you mention that Sociopsycholinguistic learning can happen only when the home life has helped establish solid foundational skills. When I first started teaching many years ago, I thought the same when teaching at the high school level. Only students that came into the building from the middle school with solid foundational skills would be able to write and articulate higher order thinking and learn through acquisition methods. Then I started working with IEP, 504 students in a co-taught environment. This changed much of my philosophy. The co-teacher started to create and promote more inquiry method lessons. These lessons allowed students to use context to perform using their strengths while having to add to the weaknesses. IT was amazing the quality of work that many of them produced. It was far higher then anything they could have produced in a highly structured lesson. Did they still need structure to help with foundations, you bet. But, I started to realize that I was limiting students with what I expected of them. I had to change in order to get the most out of them. By infusing more of a balance between the two learning styles, students began to demonstrate higher skills and have greater success.
- Matt

 
At January 30, 2013 at 1:24 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

Hi Matt,

Thank you for your response. It sounds like I am cutting my students short of their capabilities. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and your experiences. I will have to start using more inquiry method lessons. I always learn so much from you :)

 
At January 31, 2013 at 4:30 PM , Blogger Julie Harris said...

I too see an increase in student achievement when strategies that lean toward the acquisition model are used. Not only is the work better, but motivation and engagement increase. Working in a middle school, these last two are sort of the key to any kind of achievement. Middle school aged kids are just learning to test the boundaries, and will do so until they push too far. Consequently, they will always want to know the purpose for an activity, and what the answer is. If an activity requires their input of prior knowledge, and uses inquiry to generate a response, students will be far more willing to engage. When I read the list, I felt like many of the activites were learning-theory based, and nearly all of the activities I listed as acquisition are activities I prefer to use to learning-activities like worksheets. Just an interesting correlation that I see supported in my classroom practices. Thanks for sharing Amberlyn!

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home